Week 8 Analysis
What I find most intriguing this week is the class lecture and its comparison to the Sermon on the Mount. Yes it is true that Jesus preached there is a new way to live a part from the law of Torah. As he preached on the Mount he emphasized the need to assist others around us who need help in specific ways. This sermon calls for awareness and compassion It was to many in Jesus’ time a new standard of living for people. For us who are followers of Jesus we are called to the same standards. He calls humanity to be peacemakers, to do the right thing, show mercy and to love one another. The Sermon on the Mount in our specific context of ableism and ageism we may not have all the answers to solve these large complex issues. But we can develop and teach awareness and some practicalities to discuss these two issues and dialogue about equality in both groups, the elderly and the disabled.
We as believers are called like Jesus to work within in the existing structure or powers, which may not be exactly bad to strive for bettering the systems. We are called to be fair and just in all that we do. Many of the elderly and the disabled feel included and excluded from our society. To the ones who feel marginalized, as it states in the Power Practice and Redemption Methodology Welcome all, include, and encourage in their gifts. For example, encourage the elderly to get involved with their surrounding communities like helping first graders learn how to read. Encourage the people living with a disability that they too can participate; they can be taught to water ski, downhill ski, and to drive a car. These examples can prove to people who do not have a disability that the disabled are just as able to do societal things as people who are do not have a disability. As Jesus as said from time to time the kingdom of God is not just filled with one people group. It filled with many people groups, young, old, disabled, not disabled, men, women, of all different ethnicities. The Kingdom is rich filled with unity through diversity.
Diversity in the Kingdom is much like the book what Globalization and Culture is trying to decipher what is necessary for global change. Is it through hybridization or not? Hybridity would change especially in the western sense of individualism and emphasis more on a mix of themes like interculturalism instead of multiculturalism. Out of hybridization produces global mélange which has many different meanings to many different cultures. It very important to understand these differences and one final point is to understand that “we are all mixing cultural elements and traces across place and identities (109).” These cultural elements have become ordinary experience in our rapid transforming world.
